<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia-Chile FTA passes parliament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradewatch.org.au/blog/2008/11/14/australia-chile-fta-passes-parliament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradewatch.org.au/blog/2008/11/14/australia-chile-fta-passes-parliament/</link>
	<description>Find news and analysis of globalisation's impacts on people &#38; the planet and the prospects for fair and sustainable economies, from Global Trade Watch.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne OB</title>
		<link>http://tradewatch.org.au/blog/2008/11/14/australia-chile-fta-passes-parliament/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne OB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradewatch.org.au/blog/?p=60#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Hey this is really scary, Mike, that they have investor state provisions. 

I wonder how they are justifying it, if it was taken out of the A US FTA with all that public debate. Were there any media reports about this?

Or were the investor state provisions part of a template that negotiators started from, and hence felt like they didn&#039;t have to justify them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey this is really scary, Mike, that they have investor state provisions. </p>
<p>I wonder how they are justifying it, if it was taken out of the A US FTA with all that public debate. Were there any media reports about this?</p>
<p>Or were the investor state provisions part of a template that negotiators started from, and hence felt like they didn&#8217;t have to justify them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
